Page 61 - 건축구조 Vol. 29 / No. 04
P. 61

The Londoner hotel   Project focus  Project focus   The Londoner hotel

                                                                                Digging deep: design and construction of The Londoner hotel

 to address these concerns, balancing preheat,   FIGURE 13: Predicted ground movements  Monitoring  FIGURE 15: Basement waterproo ng  as ballrooms and cinemas, required column-
 heat input and interpass temperatures to   A monitoring regime was implemented   free spaces, whereas the bedroom  oors
 achieve reduced hardness levels while   throughout the build to record actual   required blade columns on a regular grid to
 maintaining toughness of the welded material.   ground movements. Baseline monitoring   minimise slab depths and hide structure within
 Heat input was restricted during fabrication   was carried out before the demolition of the   the walls. This resulted in a large number of
 and this was closely monitored throughout the   existing buildings on the site. The predicted   transfer structures within the building. Further
 welding process. A high preheat of 125°C was   movements from the analysis were then used   transfers were needed as the building stepped
 used with a maximum interpass temperature of   as the basis to set trigger levels for ongoing   back at the upper levels, as required by the
 228°C; this meant that, on occasions, welding   monitoring, with readings taken twice weekly.  planning process.
 had to be stopped to prevent excessive heat   To monitor movements, ground-level   It is interesting to consider what could
 build-up.  settlement targets, targets for 3D building                        be done diff erently were the project to be
 Before forming the trusses, a full-scale test   movements and inclinometers were installed   conceived today. The existing site was a
 weld was undertaken to demonstrate that the   on the pile wall. All the data was available via   hotchpotch of disparate and largely unusable
 welds would comply. Samples were taken   a web portal (Figure 14) and compared with   buildings which could not realistically
 before and after the test weld, with Charpy   the trigger values, with the construction and   be refurbished to create a single hotel
 impact tests carried out to ensure that the   Arup engineering teams noti ed of any issues.  development. With the planning requirements
 toughness of the parent material had not   Overall, the observed ground movements   restricting the building height, and client
 dropped off  signi cantly during the procedure.   were generally consistent with the predictions,   requiring numerous ‘black box’ spaces, a
 The largest FPBWs required up to 300   with 25–30mm of settlement observed close   deep basement was needed. The structure
 passes to complete.  Analysis  to the excavation, reducing with increased     could have been made more effi  cient by
 To ensure that all welds met the design   Ground movement impact assessments were   distance.  reducing the number and impact of transfer
 speci cation, a strict non-destructive testing   needed to gain approval from various parties.   structures, but clearly this would have needed
 (NDT) procedure was implemented as follows:  These assessments were undertaken in a   UKPN high-voltage power cable  close integration and compromise with the
 1)  A visual inspection of every weld pass was   staged approach as follows:  Many of the utilities surrounding the basement   functional requirements.
 undertaken by the welder, checking for   1)  A simple 2D retaining wall analysis was   were diverted before construction. However,
 cracks, pits, and various other aspects of the   performed in Frew . This was used to quickly   there was one particular utility within the site   Conclusion
 3
 weld.  consider the eff ect of diff erent construction   boundary that could not be diverted: a UKPN   One of the key considerations with a building
 2)  A hold time, de ned as the time after   sequences and design options.  tunnel, located 14m below the ground and   Tiltmeters were installed around the tunnel   the signi cant hydrostatic pressures which   such as this is the construction methodology.
 weld completion before NDT testing may   2)  A 2D FE analysis was carried out on a ‘slice’   containing a number of high-voltage cables   circumference, and a tilt-beam array along   are transferred to the prop slabs. Second,   It is critical this is embedded into the design
 commence, of either 24 or 48 hours had   through the basement using LS Dyna . This   serving the substation within Leicester Square   the length, to monitor the movements during   a drained, ventilated and insulated cavity is   from the outset. Understanding the drivers
 4
 to be observed depending on the carbon   was more detailed than Stage 1, accounting   and subsequently supplying the West End   construction, as well as undertaking manual   provided. Any groundwater that gets into the   for the design and potential contractor
 equivalence of the steel to allow any delayed   for sway (due to ground-level variation across   of London, which cut across the northwest   level and tape extensometer surveys.  cavity is allowed to drain to the bottom of the   preferences will be key.
 cracking to occur.  the site) and heave eff ects, but extrapolation   corner of the site.   basement, where it is collected in a sump before   The choice of top-down versus bottom-
 3)  Magnetic particle inspection was used to   was required for corner eff ects.  The tunnel impacted the position of the   Making basement habitable  being pumped away to the sewer.  up was a key decision on this project and
 detect surface and shallow subsurface   3)  Once a preferred design and construction   basement piles, which were located as close   Depending on their use and desired   As well as ensuring the basement remains   impacted the predicted ground movements,
 discontinuities. Undertaken on 100% of all   sequence had been determined, a full 3D   as possible to the tunnel. This meant there   performance, basements are categorised from   dry, there are several other considerations   sizing of structural elements and required
 large butt welds, this involves applying a   FE model of the basement construction was   was a risk of:  Grade 1 to 3 in accordance with BS 8102. As   that are critical to the function of a habitable   space for tolerances. At  rst glance, top-down
 magnetic  eld to the weld. A wet suspension   analysed using LS Dyna. With all stages of   |  striking the tunnel during the pile   the basement of The Londoner is occupied   basement space. Vertical transportation,   might have seemed a good option for this
 of iron  lings is applied to the weld and, if a   the construction sequence modelled, the   installation  by people and contains high-value spaces,   escape routes, MEP servicing and ventilation   project, with potential programme bene ts.
 discontinuity is present, magnetic  ux leakage   model took approx. one week to run (plus   |  excavation-induced movements damaging   it was crucial that there was no dampness   had to be incorporated. The space take of   However, upon closer inspection it became
 attracts the iron  lings.  time to review and process the results), so it   the tunnel structure.  and it, therefore, needed to achieve a Grade   these components combined was signi cant   apparent this was not the right approach.
 4)  Ultrasonic testing was undertaken on 100%   was important to minimise the changes to the   3 environment. This is unlike a carpark or   (Figure 16) and it was important to consider   With a large number of transfer
 of all large butt welds. This involves projecting   basement design where possible.  One of the most complex assessments   plantroom where an agreed level of water   each one early in the design process.  structures, the load within the basement
 an ultrasonic sound wave through the weld   undertaken was the impact of piling and   penetration is acceptable.  was concentrated to a few localised areas,
 at varying angles (0°, 45° and 60° normal to   Ground movements adjacent to the   excavating adjacent to this asset. Usually,   As such, the basement has two lines   Embodied carbon  exceeding the capacity of the plunge
 the steel face). The wave re ections are then   excavation throughout the build process   construction would need to be at least 2m   of defence against groundwater ingress   The embodied carbon of the project has been   columns. This would have led to a need to
 measured on a calibrated oscilloscope, with   were predicted (Figure 13). The calculated   clear from the face of such an asset but, as a   (Figure 15). First, a thick waterproof concrete   calculated using the IStructE’s Structural   install additional temporary columns and to
 any defects resulting in intermediate peaks on   movements were then imposed on the adjacent   result of detailed surveying to verify the exact   liner wall acts as a barrier to most of the   Carbon Tool. A1–A5 embodied carbon for the   limit the number of  oors over which could
 the display.  assets and buildings with the resulting strains   position of the tunnel, and providing a detailed   water entering the basement. The liner wall   structural frame is calculated at 16 616tCO e or   be constructed, removing the potential
                                                                         2
 assessed using the Burland scale to determine   method statement for the construction and   performs this function in addition to resisting   552tCO e/m , giving a SCORS rating of G.  programme savings traditionally associated
                                                    2
                                                 2
 An independent inspector was employed to   the potential damage category. With some   detailed ground-movement analysis through   The split of carbon is as follows:  with top-down construction.
 check the welds.   revision to the propping scheme, we were   LS-DYNA, piles were installed just 0.5m away   |  excavation: 757tCO e
                                                            2
 With the trusses fabricated off  site as   able to limit this to ‘very slight’ and within the   from the face of the tunnel, maximising the   FIGURE 16: Circulation and ventilation space   |  structure below ground: 8718tCO e  REFERENCES
                                                                     2
 complete 21m long units, transporting them   acceptable and agreed limits.  size of the basement.  within basement  |  structure above ground: 7141tCO e.
                                                                     2
 through central London was a challenge which
 required meticulous planning and a rolling   The building form was set in 2012 by the   1) Oasys (2022) Oasys GSA [Online] Available
 roadblock to bring them to site overnight. To   client’s functional space requirements and the   at: www.oasys-software.com/products/gsa/
 lift the trusses into position, a 750t mobile   planning requirements limiting its height. These   (Accessed: June 2022)
 crane was driven onto the ground- oor slab.   requirements, in particular the need for the deep   2) ACP (2021) Locatu: Bespoke Telematic
 To ensure the slab wasn’t over stressed by the   basement, have led to a high level of embodied   Solutions in Vehicle Asset Management
 high point loads of the crane outriggers, the slab   carbon. The basement is carbon intensive both   [Online] Available at: www.acpltd.co.uk/
 was backpropped to the foundation level at the   for the excavation and the permanent structure   (Accessed: June 2022)
 bottom of the basement.                    which restrains the basement walls.     3) Oasys (2022) Frew – Embedded Retaining
                                             A calculation has shown that, without the   Wall Analysis Software [Online] Available at:
 Ground movements                           basement, the project would have still achieved   www.oasys-software.com/products/frew/
 Ground movements were a critical design    a SCORS rating of G (410tCO e/m ). So,   (Accessed: June 2022)
                                                                    2
                                                                2
 consideration. With the site surrounded by   although the basement undoubtably adds   4) Livermore Software Technology (2020)
 buildings and utilities, estimating and monitoring of   carbon, other structural ineffi ciencies are also at   LS-DYNA [Online] Available at: www.lstc.

 ground movements had to be carried out in detail.   FIGURE 14: Ground movement monitoring portal  play. Many of the uses within the building, such   com/products/ls-dyna (Accessed: June 2022)
 33      ※ 본 기사는  CNP동양에서 선택하여 제공하고 있습니다.                   34
 thestructuralengineer.org  |  July 2022          July 2022  |  thestructuralengineer.org  Journal of  The Korea  Structural  Engineers Association  59
                                                                한국건축구조기술사회지
 Londoner Hotel_TSE July 2022_The Structural Engineer.indd   33  22/06/2022   17:57  Londoner Hotel_TSE July 2022_The Structural Engineer.indd   34  22/06/2022   17:58
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66