Page 60 - 건축구조 Vol. 29 / No. 04
P. 60

The Londoner hotel   Project focus            Project focus   The Londoner hotel

                해외작품소개

              to address these concerns, balancing preheat,   FIGURE 13: Predicted ground movements  Monitoring                     FIGURE 15: Basement waterproo ng                                     as ballrooms and cinemas, required column-
              heat input and interpass temperatures to                                A monitoring regime was implemented                                                                                   free spaces, whereas the bedroom  oors
              achieve reduced hardness levels while                                   throughout the build to record actual                                                                                 required blade columns on a regular grid to
              maintaining toughness of the welded material.                           ground movements. Baseline monitoring                                                                                 minimise slab depths and hide structure within
              Heat input was restricted during fabrication                            was carried out before the demolition of the                                                                          the walls. This resulted in a large number of
              and this was closely monitored throughout the                           existing buildings on the site. The predicted                                                                         transfer structures within the building. Further
              welding process. A high preheat of 125°C was                            movements from the analysis were then used                                                                            transfers were needed as the building stepped
              used with a maximum interpass temperature of                            as the basis to set trigger levels for ongoing                                                                        back at the upper levels, as required by the
              228°C; this meant that, on occasions, welding                           monitoring, with readings taken twice weekly.                                                                         planning process.
              had to be stopped to prevent excessive heat                              To monitor movements, ground-level                                                                                     It is interesting to consider what could
              build-up.                                                               settlement targets, targets for 3D building                                                                           be done diff erently were the project to be
                Before forming the trusses, a full-scale test                         movements and inclinometers were installed                                                                            conceived today. The existing site was a
              weld was undertaken to demonstrate that the                             on the pile wall. All the data was available via                                                                      hotchpotch of disparate and largely unusable
              welds would comply. Samples were taken                                  a web portal (Figure 14) and compared with                                                                            buildings which could not realistically
              before and after the test weld, with Charpy                             the trigger values, with the construction and                                                                         be refurbished to create a single hotel
              impact tests carried out to ensure that the                             Arup engineering teams noti ed of any issues.                                                                        development. With the planning requirements
              toughness of the parent material had not                                 Overall, the observed ground movements                                                                               restricting the building height, and client
              dropped off  signi cantly during the procedure.                         were generally consistent with the predictions,                                                                       requiring numerous ‘black box’ spaces, a
                The largest FPBWs required up to 300                                  with 25–30mm of settlement observed close                                                                             deep basement was needed. The structure
              passes to complete.                 Analysis                            to the excavation, reducing with increased                                                                            could have been made more effi  cient by
                To ensure that all welds met the design   Ground movement impact assessments were   distance.                                                                                               reducing the number and impact of transfer
              speci cation, a strict non-destructive testing   needed to gain approval from various parties.                                                                                               structures, but clearly this would have needed
              (NDT) procedure was implemented as follows:  These assessments were undertaken in a   UKPN high-voltage power cable                                                                           close integration and compromise with the
              1)  A visual inspection of every weld pass was   staged approach as follows:  Many of the utilities surrounding the basement                                                                  functional requirements.
                undertaken by the welder, checking for   1)  A simple 2D retaining wall analysis was   were diverted before construction. However,
                cracks, pits, and various other aspects of the   performed in Frew . This was used to quickly   there was one particular utility within the site                                            Conclusion
                                                                3
                weld.                               consider the eff ect of diff erent construction   boundary that could not be diverted: a UKPN                                                             One of the key considerations with a building
              2)  A hold time, de ned as the time after   sequences and design options.  tunnel, located 14m below the ground and     Tiltmeters were installed around the tunnel   the signi cant hydrostatic pressures which   such as this is the construction methodology.
                weld completion before NDT testing may   2)  A 2D FE analysis was carried out on a ‘slice’   containing a number of high-voltage cables   circumference, and a tilt-beam array along   are transferred to the prop slabs. Second,   It is critical this is embedded into the design
                commence, of either 24 or 48 hours had   through the basement using LS Dyna . This   serving the substation within Leicester Square   the length, to monitor the movements during   a drained, ventilated and insulated cavity is   from the outset. Understanding the drivers
                                                                             4
                to be observed depending on the carbon   was more detailed than Stage 1, accounting   and subsequently supplying the West End   construction, as well as undertaking manual   provided. Any groundwater that gets into the   for the design and potential contractor
                equivalence of the steel to allow any delayed   for sway (due to ground-level variation across   of London, which cut across the northwest   level and tape extensometer surveys.  cavity is allowed to drain to the bottom of the   preferences will be key.
                cracking to occur.                  the site) and heave eff ects, but extrapolation   corner of the site.                                                 basement, where it is collected in a sump before   The choice of top-down versus bottom-
              3)  Magnetic particle inspection was used to   was required for corner eff ects.  The tunnel impacted the position of the   Making basement habitable       being pumped away to the sewer.    up was a key decision on this project and
                detect surface and shallow subsurface   3)  Once a preferred design and construction   basement piles, which were located as close   Depending on their use and desired   As well as ensuring the basement remains   impacted the predicted ground movements,
                discontinuities. Undertaken on 100% of all   sequence had been determined, a full 3D   as possible to the tunnel. This meant there   performance, basements are categorised from   dry, there are several other considerations   sizing of structural elements and required
                large butt welds, this involves applying a   FE model of the basement construction was   was a risk of:              Grade 1 to 3 in accordance with BS 8102. As   that are critical to the function of a habitable   space for tolerances. At  rst glance, top-down
                magnetic  eld to the weld. A wet suspension   analysed using LS Dyna. With all stages of   |  striking the tunnel during the pile   the basement of The Londoner is occupied   basement space. Vertical transportation,   might have seemed a good option for this
                of iron  lings is applied to the weld and, if a   the construction sequence modelled, the   installation            by people and contains high-value spaces,   escape routes, MEP servicing and ventilation   project, with potential programme bene ts.
                discontinuity is present, magnetic  ux leakage   model took approx. one week to run (plus   |  excavation-induced movements damaging   it was crucial that there was no dampness   had to be incorporated. The space take of   However, upon closer inspection it became
                attracts the iron  lings.          time to review and process the results), so it   the tunnel structure.           and it, therefore, needed to achieve a Grade   these components combined was signi cant   apparent this was not the right approach.
              4)  Ultrasonic testing was undertaken on 100%   was important to minimise the changes to the                           3 environment. This is unlike a carpark or   (Figure 16) and it was important to consider   With a large number of transfer
                of all large butt welds. This involves projecting   basement design where possible.  One of the most complex assessments   plantroom where an agreed level of water   each one early in the design process.  structures, the load within the basement
                an ultrasonic sound wave through the weld                             undertaken was the impact of piling and        penetration is acceptable.                                             was concentrated to a few localised areas,
                at varying angles (0°, 45° and 60° normal to   Ground movements adjacent to the   excavating adjacent to this asset. Usually,   As such, the basement has two lines   Embodied carbon       exceeding the capacity of the plunge
                the steel face). The wave re ections are then   excavation throughout the build process   construction would need to be at least 2m   of defence against groundwater ingress   The embodied carbon of the project has been   columns. This would have led to a need to
                measured on a calibrated oscilloscope, with   were predicted (Figure 13). The calculated   clear from the face of such an asset but, as a   (Figure 15). First, a thick waterproof concrete   calculated using the IStructE’s Structural   install additional temporary columns and to
                any defects resulting in intermediate peaks on   movements were then imposed on the adjacent   result of detailed surveying to verify the exact   liner wall acts as a barrier to most of the   Carbon Tool. A1–A5 embodied carbon for the   limit the number of  oors over which could
                the display.                      assets and buildings with the resulting strains   position of the tunnel, and providing a detailed   water entering the basement. The liner wall   structural frame is calculated at 16 616tCO e or   be constructed, removing the potential
                                                                                                                                                                                                      2
                                                  assessed using the Burland scale to determine   method statement for the construction and   performs this function in addition to resisting   552tCO e/m , giving a SCORS rating of G.  programme savings traditionally associated
                                                                                                                                                                                 2
                                                                                                                                                                              2
                An independent inspector was employed to   the potential damage category. With some   detailed ground-movement analysis through                           The split of carbon is as follows:  with top-down construction.
              check the welds.                    revision to the propping scheme, we were   LS-DYNA, piles were installed just 0.5m away                                |  excavation: 757tCO e
                                                                                                                                                                                        2
                With the trusses fabricated off  site as   able to limit this to ‘very slight’ and within the   from the face of the tunnel, maximising the   FIGURE 16: Circulation and ventilation space   |  structure below ground: 8718tCO e  REFERENCES
                                                                                                                                                                                                  2
              complete 21m long units, transporting them   acceptable and agreed limits.  size of the basement.                      within basement                     |  structure above ground: 7141tCO e.
                                                                                                                                                                                                  2
              through central London was a challenge which
              required meticulous planning and a rolling                                                                                                                  The building form was set in 2012 by the   1) Oasys (2022) Oasys GSA [Online] Available
              roadblock to bring them to site overnight. To                                                                                                              client’s functional space requirements and the   at: www.oasys-software.com/products/gsa/
              lift the trusses into position, a 750t mobile                                                                                                              planning requirements limiting its height. These   (Accessed: June 2022)
              crane was driven onto the ground- oor slab.                                                                                                               requirements, in particular the need for the deep   2) ACP (2021) Locatu: Bespoke Telematic
              To ensure the slab wasn’t over stressed by the                                                                                                             basement, have led to a high level of embodied   Solutions in Vehicle Asset Management
              high point loads of the crane outriggers, the slab                                                                                                         carbon. The basement is carbon intensive both   [Online] Available at: www.acpltd.co.uk/
              was backpropped to the foundation level at the                                                                                                             for the excavation and the permanent structure   (Accessed: June 2022)
              bottom of the basement.                                                                                                                                    which restrains the basement walls.     3) Oasys (2022) Frew – Embedded Retaining
                                                                                                                                                                          A calculation has shown that, without the   Wall Analysis Software [Online] Available at:
              Ground movements                                                                                                                                           basement, the project would have still achieved   www.oasys-software.com/products/frew/
              Ground movements were a critical design                                                                                                                    a SCORS rating of G (410tCO e/m ). So,   (Accessed: June 2022)
                                                                                                                                                                                                2
                                                                                                                                                                                             2
              consideration. With the site surrounded by                                                                                                                 although the basement undoubtably adds   4) Livermore Software Technology (2020)
              buildings and utilities, estimating and monitoring of                                                                                                      carbon, other structural ineffi ciencies are also at   LS-DYNA [Online] Available at: www.lstc.

              ground movements had to be carried out in detail.   FIGURE 14: Ground movement monitoring portal                                                          play. Many of the uses within the building, such   com/products/ls-dyna (Accessed: June 2022)
                                                                  33                                                                                                                    34
           58    건 축 구 조    2022 _ 07 _ 08   제29권 / 제04호  thestructuralengineer.org  |  July 2022                                                                              July 2022  |  thestructuralengineer.org
         Londoner Hotel_TSE July 2022_The Structural Engineer.indd   33                                            22/06/2022   17:57  Londoner Hotel_TSE July 2022_The Structural Engineer.indd   34                                     22/06/2022   17:58
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65